Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)

Government Of Andhra Pradesh & Anr vs Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd on 1 May, 1975

As slated supra, in Hindustan Machine Tools Case (supra), the Supreme Court was considering a case wherein there was no provision for levying the fee on construction of the building. Interpreting the provisions and considering the factsof that case, it was held that a Gram Panchayat of A. P. has no power to levy fee for construction of a building. But, in the present case, Section 69 (i v) of the Act empowers the Gram Panchayat for levying fee for use of the poramboke land under the control of (he Gram Panchayat. Thus, there is a specific provision in the Act which empowers the Gram Panchayat for levying fee for use of the poramboke land under its control. The facts of the present case are different.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 88 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document

Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs Orient Paper & Industris Ltd on 9 November, 1994

10. There are two types of fees: one is levied for services rendered for which quid pro quo is essential; and the other is levied for use of the property of the Local Authority. Where the fee is levied for the use of the property of the Local Authority, there is no requirement of quid pro quo and this principle has been considered by the Supreme Court in Upaj Mandi Samiti's Case (supra):--
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 140 - P B Sawant - Full Document
1