Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)
Subasri Kumar vs The Registrar on 9 December, 2025 cites

State Of U.P. & Anr vs Pawan Kumar Tiwari & Ors on 4 January, 2005

10. No doubt, Medical Council of India Regulations does not speak about awarding any grace marks. It only speaks about percentage of marks. Therefore, if the percentage is taken into consideration, the petitioner has got 49.66% and the fraction obtained by the petitioner is more than 0.5, namely 0.66 and therefore, it should be rounded off to the nearest round figure namely 49.66% to 50%. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held in the case of State of U.P and another Vs. Pawan Kumar Tiwari and others, reported in (2005) 2 SCC 10 states that rounding off is based on logic and common sense. If one half or more, its value shall be increased to one and if part is less than half, then its value should be ignored. Paragraph 7 of the Judgment is extracted as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 143 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

The Punjab State Coop.Supply & ... vs Ashok Kumar Mehta And Another on 21 March, 2011

11. Though the Judgment arises out of the issue regarding reservation, still the rounding off concept could be taken from the Judgment. Similarly, it is the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State Bank of Punjab and another Vs. Asha Mehta, reported in (1997) 11 SCC 410 wherein it has been stated that rounding off 32.5% to 33% is purely an arithmetical calculation, a procedure which the Public Service Commission, in fairness has been adopting.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 12 - M S Sullar - Full Document
1