Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.31 seconds)Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 182 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 2 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Article 183 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Union Of India And Ors vs West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. & Anr on 5 February, 2004
The said decision has been followed by this Court in a large number
of decisions including Union of India and Others Vs. West Coast Paper
Mills Ltd. and Another [(2004) 2 SCC 747].
Raja Mechanical Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 21 December, 2001
However, when an appeal is dismissed on the ground that delay in
filing the same is not condoned, the doctrine of merger shall not apply. [See
Raja Mechanical Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
ILR 2002 (1) Del. 33]
RATANSINGH:
Ratansingh vs Vijaysingh And Ors on 11 December, 2000
Ratan Singh (supra), therefore, has no application in this case as
admittedly herein the High Court upon dismissal of the Second Appeal had
drawn up a formal decree on 30th October, 1986.
Lalji Raja & Sons vs Firm Hansraj Nathuram on 23 February, 1971
Section 48 of the Code and Article 182 of the old Limitation Act
applied to the execution of decrees or orders passed by the courts other than
those established by Royal Charter and of the Supreme Court whereas
Article 183 applied to execution of decrees and orders of courts established
by Royal Charter and Supreme Court. Section 48 of the Code provided for a
maximum period of 12 years before the expiry of which any fresh
application for execution had to be made. The period of limitation
provided under Section 48 of the Code used to be controlled by Articles 182
and 183 of the old Limitation Act. (See Lalji Raja Vs. Farm Hansraj, AIR
1971 SC 974).