State Of Punjab And Ors vs Ram Singh Ex. Constable on 24 July, 1992
In State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Ram Singh Ex. Constable [1992 (4)
SCC 54], it was stated:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.45 seconds)Chairman & M.D., Bharat Pet. Corpn. Ltd. ... vs T.K. Raju on 24 February, 2006
[See also Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs. T.K. Raju, [2006 (3) SCC
143].
Union Of India & Ors vs J. Ahmed on 7 March, 1979
In Union of
India & Ors. vs. J. Ahmed (1979 (2) SCC 286), whereupon Mr. Sharan
himself has placed reliance, this Court held so stating:
Shardaprasad Onkarprasad Tiwari And ... vs Central Railway (Divisional ... on 31 July, 1959
This view was adopted in Shardaprasad
Onkarprasad Tiwari v. Divisional Superintendent,
Central Railway, Nagpur Division, Nagpur, (61 Bom
LR 1596), and Satubha K. Vaghela v. Moosa Raza
(10 Guj LR 23). The High Court has noted the
definition of misconduct in Stroud's Judicial
Dictionary which runs as under:
Satubha K. Vaghela vs Moosa Raza, The District Development ... on 21 February, 1968
This view was adopted in Shardaprasad
Onkarprasad Tiwari v. Divisional Superintendent,
Central Railway, Nagpur Division, Nagpur, (61 Bom
LR 1596), and Satubha K. Vaghela v. Moosa Raza
(10 Guj LR 23). The High Court has noted the
definition of misconduct in Stroud's Judicial
Dictionary which runs as under:
Zunjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar vs U.O.I. And Others on 6 August, 1999
A finding of fact was arrived at that the accused did not make
demand of any amount from the complainant and thus no case has been
made out against him. This Court in Zunjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar vs.
Union of India & Ors., [1999 (7) SCC 409], has categorically held:
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1