Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.26 seconds)Union Of India vs Bungo Steel Furniture Pvt. Ltd on 14 September, 1966
Lastly, the
7 of 13
::: Downloaded on - 18-02-2019 02:05:38 :::
CR No.3697 of 2016 -8-
decision in the Central Bank of India case (supra) did not deal with the
issue around interpretation of sub-section (7) of Section 31 of the Act,
1996, nor did the principle laid down therein hold contrary to the
decision in S.L. Arora case (supra)".
Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2006
The McDermott case (supra) did not deal
with the question pertaining to awarding of 'interest on interest' or
compound interest.
M/S Hyder Consulting(Uk) Ltd vs Governer State Of Orissa Tr.Chief Eng on 25 November, 2014
20. The above position of law, thus, expounded in the majority
judgment in M/s Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd.'s case (supra), even though
cited on behalf of the respondent, actually supports the case of the
petitioner to the extent that the accrued interest for the period between the
date of 'pronouncement of award' and of its becoming a 'decree' actually
merges into the amount awarded, and claiming of interest upon said
'decretal amount' subsequently does not amount to charging 'interest on
interest'.
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Haryana Tourism Corporation Ltd. And ... vs Bodh Raj Gupta And Another on 2 November, 2000
11. Furthermore, the petitioner side has relied upon a decision of
this Court in "Haryana Tourism Corporation Ltd. and another vs. Bodh
Raj Gupta and another", 2001 (1) RCR (Civil) 402, in which a Single
Judge had only partly allowed the revision filed against the contractor-
respondent and observed inter alia "Resultantly, this revision is partly
allowed by rejecting the objection of jurisdiction and it is hereby declared
that the contractor-respondent shall get the amount awarded by the
arbitrator along with interest at the rate of 15% from the date of the
award up to the date when it became rule of the Court and he will further
get interest at the rate of 9% from the date of the decree up to the date of
the payment. There shall be no order as to costs".
State Of Punjab And Another vs M/S S. S. Construction Engineers And on 18 January, 2010
The decision of this Court in the Three Circles case (supra) was
rightly held to be passed on inadvertent erroneous assumption, as stated
in the S.L. Arora case (supra).
1