Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.29 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Gursharan Singh & Ors. Etc. Etc vs New Delhi Municipal Committee & Ors on 2 February, 1996
67. By now it is settled that the guarantee of
equality before law enshrined in Article 14 is a positive
concept and it cannot be enforced by a citizen or court in
a negative manner. If an illegality or irregularity has been
committed in favour of any individual or a group of
individuals or a wrong order has been passed by a
-4-
judicial forum, others cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the
higher or superior court for repeating or multiplying the
same irregularity or illegality or for passing wrong order--
Chandigarh Admn. v. Jagjit Singh, Jaipur Development
Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain, Union of India v. J.V.
Subhaiah, Gursharan Singh v. NDMC, State of Haryana
v. Ram Kumar Mann, Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D.G.
Health Services, Style (Dress Land) v. UT, Chandigarh,
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh, Union of
India v. International Trading Co. and Directorate of Film
Festivals v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain."
The State Of Haryana & Ors vs Ram Kumar Mann on 20 February, 1997
67. By now it is settled that the guarantee of
equality before law enshrined in Article 14 is a positive
concept and it cannot be enforced by a citizen or court in
a negative manner. If an illegality or irregularity has been
committed in favour of any individual or a group of
individuals or a wrong order has been passed by a
-4-
judicial forum, others cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the
higher or superior court for repeating or multiplying the
same irregularity or illegality or for passing wrong order--
Chandigarh Admn. v. Jagjit Singh, Jaipur Development
Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain, Union of India v. J.V.
Subhaiah, Gursharan Singh v. NDMC, State of Haryana
v. Ram Kumar Mann, Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D.G.
Health Services, Style (Dress Land) v. UT, Chandigarh,
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh, Union of
India v. International Trading Co. and Directorate of Film
Festivals v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain."
M/S. Faridabad Ct Scan Centre vs D. G. Health Services & Ors on 15 September, 1997
67. By now it is settled that the guarantee of
equality before law enshrined in Article 14 is a positive
concept and it cannot be enforced by a citizen or court in
a negative manner. If an illegality or irregularity has been
committed in favour of any individual or a group of
individuals or a wrong order has been passed by a
-4-
judicial forum, others cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the
higher or superior court for repeating or multiplying the
same irregularity or illegality or for passing wrong order--
Chandigarh Admn. v. Jagjit Singh, Jaipur Development
Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain, Union of India v. J.V.
Subhaiah, Gursharan Singh v. NDMC, State of Haryana
v. Ram Kumar Mann, Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D.G.
Health Services, Style (Dress Land) v. UT, Chandigarh,
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh, Union of
India v. International Trading Co. and Directorate of Film
Festivals v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain."
M/S.Style (Dress Land) vs Union Territory Chandigarh & Anr on 18 August, 1999
67. By now it is settled that the guarantee of
equality before law enshrined in Article 14 is a positive
concept and it cannot be enforced by a citizen or court in
a negative manner. If an illegality or irregularity has been
committed in favour of any individual or a group of
individuals or a wrong order has been passed by a
-4-
judicial forum, others cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the
higher or superior court for repeating or multiplying the
same irregularity or illegality or for passing wrong order--
Chandigarh Admn. v. Jagjit Singh, Jaipur Development
Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain, Union of India v. J.V.
Subhaiah, Gursharan Singh v. NDMC, State of Haryana
v. Ram Kumar Mann, Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D.G.
Health Services, Style (Dress Land) v. UT, Chandigarh,
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh, Union of
India v. International Trading Co. and Directorate of Film
Festivals v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain."
State Of Bihar & Ors vs Kameshwar Prasad Singh & Anr on 27 April, 2000
67. By now it is settled that the guarantee of
equality before law enshrined in Article 14 is a positive
concept and it cannot be enforced by a citizen or court in
a negative manner. If an illegality or irregularity has been
committed in favour of any individual or a group of
individuals or a wrong order has been passed by a
-4-
judicial forum, others cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the
higher or superior court for repeating or multiplying the
same irregularity or illegality or for passing wrong order--
Chandigarh Admn. v. Jagjit Singh, Jaipur Development
Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain, Union of India v. J.V.
Subhaiah, Gursharan Singh v. NDMC, State of Haryana
v. Ram Kumar Mann, Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D.G.
Health Services, Style (Dress Land) v. UT, Chandigarh,
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh, Union of
India v. International Trading Co. and Directorate of Film
Festivals v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain."
T.Lakshmipathi & Ors vs P.Nithyananda Reddy & Ors on 31 March, 2003
67. By now it is settled that the guarantee of
equality before law enshrined in Article 14 is a positive
concept and it cannot be enforced by a citizen or court in
a negative manner. If an illegality or irregularity has been
committed in favour of any individual or a group of
individuals or a wrong order has been passed by a
-4-
judicial forum, others cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the
higher or superior court for repeating or multiplying the
same irregularity or illegality or for passing wrong order--
Chandigarh Admn. v. Jagjit Singh, Jaipur Development
Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain, Union of India v. J.V.
Subhaiah, Gursharan Singh v. NDMC, State of Haryana
v. Ram Kumar Mann, Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D.G.
Health Services, Style (Dress Land) v. UT, Chandigarh,
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh, Union of
India v. International Trading Co. and Directorate of Film
Festivals v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain."
Directorate Of Film Festivals & Ors vs Gaurav Ashwin Jain & Ors on 11 April, 2007
67. By now it is settled that the guarantee of
equality before law enshrined in Article 14 is a positive
concept and it cannot be enforced by a citizen or court in
a negative manner. If an illegality or irregularity has been
committed in favour of any individual or a group of
individuals or a wrong order has been passed by a
-4-
judicial forum, others cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the
higher or superior court for repeating or multiplying the
same irregularity or illegality or for passing wrong order--
Chandigarh Admn. v. Jagjit Singh, Jaipur Development
Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain, Union of India v. J.V.
Subhaiah, Gursharan Singh v. NDMC, State of Haryana
v. Ram Kumar Mann, Faridabad CT. Scan Centre v. D.G.
Health Services, Style (Dress Land) v. UT, Chandigarh,
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh, Union of
India v. International Trading Co. and Directorate of Film
Festivals v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain."
State Of Orissa & Anr vs Mamata Mohanty on 9 February, 2011
In State of Orissa v. Mamata Mohanty, it was
observed as under: