Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)Prem Chand Jain vs State Of Raj & Ors on 4 March, 2011
15. In this case, it is admitted fact that the revisionist/defendant
was inducted as tenant admittedly by Sh. Jugminder Dass Jain,
father of the present plaintiff/respondent. Sh. Jugminder Dass
RCA No. 16/12 6 of 8
Smt. Amrao Devi @ Umrao Devi Vs Late Prem Chand Jain
Jain executed two Wills dated 3.6.1991 and 29.7.1992 and two
separate probate petitions were filed bearing no. 232/06 titled
Prem Chand Jain Vs State and the other bearing no. 234/06 titled
as Sukhbir Singh Jain vs State. Both these petitions were
disposed of vide order dt. 12.5.2008 in view of the settlement
reached between Sukhbir Singh Jain and Sh. Prem Chand Jain.
In view of the settlement, the cases filed by them against each
other were also withdrawn and according to that settlement the
suit property in part of which revisionist is tenant fell to the share
of plaintiff/respondent.
Syed Mohammed Main Nizami (Deceased) ... vs Qasima Khatoon & Ors. on 29 November, 2011
The revisionist/defendant being tenant
cannot object to the compromise reached between the owners of
the property or the Will executed by the owner/landlord of the
property as held in judgment cited as: A.K. Nayar Vs Mahesh
Prasad, 153 (2008) DLT423 and Syed Mohammed Mian Nizami
Vs Qasima Khatoori 2012 (1) Rent L. R 63.
Sri Sukhbeer Singh Jain vs State Of U.P. on 31 August, 2010
15. In this case, it is admitted fact that the revisionist/defendant
was inducted as tenant admittedly by Sh. Jugminder Dass Jain,
father of the present plaintiff/respondent. Sh. Jugminder Dass
RCA No. 16/12 6 of 8
Smt. Amrao Devi @ Umrao Devi Vs Late Prem Chand Jain
Jain executed two Wills dated 3.6.1991 and 29.7.1992 and two
separate probate petitions were filed bearing no. 232/06 titled
Prem Chand Jain Vs State and the other bearing no. 234/06 titled
as Sukhbir Singh Jain vs State. Both these petitions were
disposed of vide order dt. 12.5.2008 in view of the settlement
reached between Sukhbir Singh Jain and Sh. Prem Chand Jain.
In view of the settlement, the cases filed by them against each
other were also withdrawn and according to that settlement the
suit property in part of which revisionist is tenant fell to the share
of plaintiff/respondent.
1