Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)

Smt. Cheryl Maria Fernandes, Mumbai vs Ito (It)-2(3)(1), Mumbai on 15 January, 2021

(d) As per Finance Act 2020, the buffer of 5% qua S. 43CA was further enhanced to 10%. Taking support of such relaxations in later enactments, the assessee contends that the relaxations were given in applicability of Section 43CA b y Finance Act 2018 and Finance Act 2020 to mitigate the undue and intended hardships faced by the taxpayers and is thus curative in nature; hence retrospective in operation and thus equally applicable to Assessment Year 2016-17 in question with same force. For such interpretation, reliance was placed on the decision of the Co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Faber Construction Vs. ACIT in ITA No. 198/Mum/2019. Another reference was to decision in the case of Maria Fernandes Cheryl Vs ITO (2021) 187 ITD 738 (Mum) rendered albeit in the context Section 50C of the Act.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 16 - Cited by 34 - Full Document

M/S. Feber Construction,, Mumbai vs Acit-21(1),, Mumbai on 12 March, 2020

(d) As per Finance Act 2020, the buffer of 5% qua S. 43CA was further enhanced to 10%. Taking support of such relaxations in later enactments, the assessee contends that the relaxations were given in applicability of Section 43CA b y Finance Act 2018 and Finance Act 2020 to mitigate the undue and intended hardships faced by the taxpayers and is thus curative in nature; hence retrospective in operation and thus equally applicable to Assessment Year 2016-17 in question with same force. For such interpretation, reliance was placed on the decision of the Co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Faber Construction Vs. ACIT in ITA No. 198/Mum/2019. Another reference was to decision in the case of Maria Fernandes Cheryl Vs ITO (2021) 187 ITD 738 (Mum) rendered albeit in the context Section 50C of the Act.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1