Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)
M.P. Badalkar vs Smt. Shanta Sarojini Badalkar And Anr. on 6 March, 1987 cites

Lalit Lazarus vs Smt. Lavina Lazarus And Anr. on 24 November, 1978

4. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and on examination of the record, we are satisfied that the decree nisi for dissolution of marriage has been rightly passed by the trial Court. There is no reason why the statements of the petitioner and his son should not be accepted The evidence so recorded on behalf of the petitioner has gone unrebutted and there is no evidence to the contrary. We are also satisfied that there is no collusion between the parties. As has been held in Lalit v. Lavina, AIR 1979 Madh Pra 70 (FB) the only requirement to prove the case by the petitioner is by preponderance of probabilities and the degree of probability depends on the gravity of the offence. We are satisfied that the petitioner has been able to prove his case.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1