Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)State Of Madhya Pradesh And Another vs Syed Naseem Zahir And Others on 13 October, 1992
(iii) In case law reported as Sadhu Singh Vs. State of
Punjab 1997 (3) Crime 55 the Punjab & Haryana High Court had
State Vs. Naseem; FIR No. 91/17; PS RN 5/6
observed as under:
"5. In a criminal trial, it is for the prosecution
to establish its case beyond all reasonable
doubts. It is for the prosecution to travel the
entire distance from 'may have' to 'must have'.
If the prosecution appears to be improbable or
lacks credibility the benefit of doubt necessarily
has to go to the accused".
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 380 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 457 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sadhu Singh Roda S/O Buta Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 1984
(iii) In case law reported as Sadhu Singh Vs. State of
Punjab 1997 (3) Crime 55 the Punjab & Haryana High Court had
State Vs. Naseem; FIR No. 91/17; PS RN 5/6
observed as under:
"5. In a criminal trial, it is for the prosecution
to establish its case beyond all reasonable
doubts. It is for the prosecution to travel the
entire distance from 'may have' to 'must have'.
If the prosecution appears to be improbable or
lacks credibility the benefit of doubt necessarily
has to go to the accused".
Sat Pal vs Delhi Administration on 29 September, 1975
(ii) The law on appreciation of evidence in the event of
witness turning hostile was discussed by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in case titled as Sat Paul Vs. Delhi Administration, AIR
1976 SC 294.
1