cites: 150985649

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

As per Ex.A4-P.M.E. Report, the deceased was aged about 48 years at the time of the accident, the appropriate multiplier is '13' as per the decision reported in Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation(2 supra). Adopting multiplier '13, the total loss of dependency would be Rs.2,812/- x 12 x 13 = Rs.4,38,672.00.

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Swaran Singh & Ors on 5 January, 2004

Recently, the Apex Court in the case of Shamanna v. The Divisional Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Others4, following its earlier decision in Swaran Singh (1 supra), reiterated that "even if the driver does not possess any 3 (2004) 3 SCC 297 4 2018 ACJ 2163 8 GSD, J Macma_453_2014 driving license, still the insurer is liable to pay the compensation and that he can recover the award amount from the owner of the offending vehicle after paying the amount." In view of the above, the Insurance Company is directed to pay the compensation amount at the first instance and then recover the same from the owner of the vehicle.

Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 3847 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

The claimants are also entitled to Rs.77,000/- under the conventional heads as per Pranay Sethi's case (1 supra). Thus, in all the claimants are entitled to Rs.5,15,672/-.

Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document

Sri Laxman @ Laxman Mourya vs Divisional Manager, ... on 8 November, 2011

In Laxman @ Laxman Mourya Vs. Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited and another5, the Apex Court while referring to Nagappa Vs. Gurudayal Singh6 held as under:

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 311 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Nagappa vs Gurudayal Singh & Ors on 3 December, 2002

In Laxman @ Laxman Mourya Vs. Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited and another5, the Apex Court while referring to Nagappa Vs. Gurudayal Singh6 held as under:

Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1279 - Full Document

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 94259

Shamanna vs The Divisional Manager The Oriental ... on 8 August, 2018

Recently, the Apex Court in the case of Shamanna v. The Divisional Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Others4, following its earlier decision in Swaran Singh (1 supra), reiterated that "even if the driver does not possess any 3 (2004) 3 SCC 297 4 2018 ACJ 2163 8 GSD, J Macma_453_2014 driving license, still the insurer is liable to pay the compensation and that he can recover the award amount from the owner of the offending vehicle after paying the amount." In view of the above, the Insurance Company is directed to pay the compensation amount at the first instance and then recover the same from the owner of the vehicle.

Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 494 - R Banumathi - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results