Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.37 seconds)
Neettiyath Kalathil Parukutty Amma And ... vs Puthiyedath Parukutty Amma And Ors. on 9 October, 1998
cites
Pramod Kumari Bhatia vs Om Prakash Bhatia And Ors on 15 November, 1979
In Pramod Kumari v. Om Prakash, AIR 1980 SC 446 : (1980 All LJ 163) the Supreme Court
held that the Court has power to supply words in order to effectuate the intention of the testator. Understood in the light of the relevant principles, the expression 'cash in hand' has to be construed widely to include the balances in the Savings Bank Accounts of the testator.
Pearey Lal vs Rameshwar Das on 10 December, 1962
In Pearcy Lal v. Rameshwar Das, AIR 1963 SC 1703 at 1706 the Supreme Court stated :
Section 74 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 111 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 372 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
1