Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)
Dr. Neelu Basant vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 December, 2015 cites

Kalyani Mathivanan vs K V Keyaraj And Ors on 11 March, 2015

13. Petitioners' counsel thereafter tries to take a plea that the rule of the game is sought to be changed midway by bringing certain clarification and notification after the initial advertisement, which is not permissible as held by Hon`ble Apex Court in several cases. Reliance is placed on the decision rendered in the case of Kalyani Mathivanan Vs. K. V. Jeyaraj and others, (2015) 6 SCC 363 [Para 27 and 56] as well as the decision rendered in the case of P Mahendran and others Vs. State of Karnataka and others, AIR 1990 SC 405.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 181 - S J Mukhopadhaya - Full Document

P. Mahendran vs State Of Karnataka on 5 December, 1989

13. Petitioners' counsel thereafter tries to take a plea that the rule of the game is sought to be changed midway by bringing certain clarification and notification after the initial advertisement, which is not permissible as held by Hon`ble Apex Court in several cases. Reliance is placed on the decision rendered in the case of Kalyani Mathivanan Vs. K. V. Jeyaraj and others, (2015) 6 SCC 363 [Para 27 and 56] as well as the decision rendered in the case of P Mahendran and others Vs. State of Karnataka and others, AIR 1990 SC 405.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 462 - K N Singh - Full Document
1