Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 4 January, 2012
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner primarily
contends that even though the detenue was involved in various
criminal cases, which have been lodged against him and some
cases were pending, the Detaining Authority has not applied its
mind, while passing the detention order. That the detenue was on
bail in those cases, which have been lodged against him. The
4
detention order does not even make reference of the orders that
the detenue was on bail. Therefore, there is non-application of
mind. Hence, the impugned order of detention requires to be
quashed. He relies on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court
reported in AIR 2012 SC 890 in the case of Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite
Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.