Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)
Sri Dipak Kumar Samanta And Others vs The State Of West Bengal And Ors on 20 June, 2018 cites

Thalappalam Service Co-Operative Bank ... vs Kerala State Co-Operative Rubber ... on 31 October, 2013

However, one cannot lose sight of the decision decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Thalappalam Service Cooperative 5 Bank Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala reported in (2013) 16 SCC 82 wherein it was held that the said Cooperative Bank is not 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. In the Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank decision (supra), the Supreme Court was considering application of the Right to Information Act 2004.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 151 - V Chitambaresh - Full Document

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Maharaja Dharmander Prasad Singh Etc on 17 January, 1989

The writ petitioner relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of State Of U.P. & Ors Vs Maharaja Dharmander Prasad Singh reported in (1989) 2 SCC 505, in support of his argument that even a private lease cannot be terminated and/or revoked contrary to the due process of law. The said case involved a statutory lease under Section 15 of the U. P. Town Planning and Development Act, 1973. Such being the factual basis of the case, the same can have no relevance in the facts of the instant case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 528 - M Rangnath - Full Document

Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corp.& Ors vs M/S Gayatri Construction Company & Anr on 6 August, 2008

I am however inclined to apply the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and others Vs. Gayatri Construction Company and another reported in (2008) 8 Supreme Court Cases 172 as also in the case of Supriyo Basu Vs. W.B.Housing Board reported in (2005) 6 SCC Pg 289. These have been cited by the 4th Respondent and the State. In both the case the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court is in harmony with a large number of its earlier and subsequent decisions. The ratio in the said decisions was inter alia that even if a State authority is charged with violation of any right such right 8 must be in the nature of a public right and arising out a public function.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 94 - Full Document

Supriyo Basu And Ors vs West Bengal Housing Board And Ors on 5 August, 2005

I am however inclined to apply the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and others Vs. Gayatri Construction Company and another reported in (2008) 8 Supreme Court Cases 172 as also in the case of Supriyo Basu Vs. W.B.Housing Board reported in (2005) 6 SCC Pg 289. These have been cited by the 4th Respondent and the State. In both the case the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court is in harmony with a large number of its earlier and subsequent decisions. The ratio in the said decisions was inter alia that even if a State authority is charged with violation of any right such right 8 must be in the nature of a public right and arising out a public function.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 46 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next