Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (3.43 seconds)
Chand vs Sanjeev Kumar on 3 June, 2022 cites

Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010

counsel for the petitioner that considering the ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court in Damodar S.Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. (2010)5 SCC 663, the Apex Court in Madhya Pradesh Legal Services Authority vs. Prateek Jain and another (2014)10 SCC 690 wherein it has been held that Court may reduce compounding fee for given facts and circumstances of a particular case, present case is a fit case for exemption of compounding fee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 5512 - Full Document

M.P. State Legal Service Authority vs Prateek Jain And Anr on 10 September, 2014

counsel for the petitioner that considering the ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court in Damodar S.Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. (2010)5 SCC 663, the Apex Court in Madhya Pradesh Legal Services Authority vs. Prateek Jain and another (2014)10 SCC 690 wherein it has been held that Court may reduce compounding fee for given facts and circumstances of a particular case, present case is a fit case for exemption of compounding fee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 359 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1