Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 33 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Sri Hardyal on 10 April, 1985
10. The appellant has referred to several judgments, including
those reported at (1985) 2 SCC 629 (State of Punjab vs. Hardyal),
AIR 1962 SC 78 (Hari Shanker Lal vs. Shambhu Nath) and (1987) 4
SCC 93 (Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd vs. Rajasekhar Rao),
for the proposition that it is only a court which can enlarge the time to
make and publish an award unless the arbitration agreement between
the parties confers any right on the parties to consent thereto. It must
__________
Page 5 of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 9
OSA No.97 of 2020
also be noticed that courts have been lenient in enlarging the time to
make and publish the award, particularly since Section 28(1) of the Act
of 1940 permitted the enlargement of the time even before or after
the award had been made and published.
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 36 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Pearey Lal Behari Lal And Anr. vs Krishan Sarup Shambhu Nath And Anr. on 29 March, 1963
10. The appellant has referred to several judgments, including
those reported at (1985) 2 SCC 629 (State of Punjab vs. Hardyal),
AIR 1962 SC 78 (Hari Shanker Lal vs. Shambhu Nath) and (1987) 4
SCC 93 (Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd vs. Rajasekhar Rao),
for the proposition that it is only a court which can enlarge the time to
make and publish an award unless the arbitration agreement between
the parties confers any right on the parties to consent thereto. It must
__________
Page 5 of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 9
OSA No.97 of 2020
also be noticed that courts have been lenient in enlarging the time to
make and publish the award, particularly since Section 28(1) of the Act
of 1940 permitted the enlargement of the time even before or after
the award had been made and published.
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd vs C. Rajasekhar Rao on 27 July, 1987
10. The appellant has referred to several judgments, including
those reported at (1985) 2 SCC 629 (State of Punjab vs. Hardyal),
AIR 1962 SC 78 (Hari Shanker Lal vs. Shambhu Nath) and (1987) 4
SCC 93 (Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd vs. Rajasekhar Rao),
for the proposition that it is only a court which can enlarge the time to
make and publish an award unless the arbitration agreement between
the parties confers any right on the parties to consent thereto. It must
__________
Page 5 of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 9
OSA No.97 of 2020
also be noticed that courts have been lenient in enlarging the time to
make and publish the award, particularly since Section 28(1) of the Act
of 1940 permitted the enlargement of the time even before or after
the award had been made and published.