cites: 154177786

1 - 10 of 11 (0.50 seconds)

Maihar Cement vs Union Of India on 28 February, 2024 cites

M/S Maihar Cement vs Union Of India on 25 April, 2012

In the matter of M/s Maihar Cement Vs Union of India and Ors. AIR 2012 MP 104, as per paragraph-4 of the order, it was not in dispute that in all the cases, the cement was transported through a shorter route whereas this fact was disputed in these cases and as per paragraph-26 of the order it is not proved that the goods in all appeals was transported through shorter route of Chord Line of Bansapahar-Ohan.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Section 17 in The Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 85

Section 106 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 161

Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 16387

Section 23 in The Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2155

The Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 1221

Section 13 in The Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 241

Section 3 in The Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 36

Smt. Uma Bai vs Union Of India on 18 May, 2017

So, the appellant are not entitled for any relief on the basis of M/s Maihar Cement (supra) and Associated Cement Company Limited Durg (supra).

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 88 - Cited by 26 - A K Joshi - Full Document

The Associated Cement Co. Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 15 May, 1997

So, the appellant are not entitled for any relief on the basis of M/s Maihar Cement (supra) and Associated Cement Company Limited Durg (supra).

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

1 2 Next