Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.34 seconds)Section 211 in The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 [Entire Act]
Province Of Bombay vs Hormusji Manekji on 12 July, 1947
(6) Province of Bombay v. Hormusji Manekji-
50 B.L.R. 524 (P.C.).
Section 1 in The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 [Entire Act]
Section 67 in The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 [Entire Act]
The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888
Shri Mithoo Shahani And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 10 March, 1964
(b) it is obligatory for the sanad to be granted in form MI.
Relying on Shri Mithoo Shahani v. Union of India(1) the
learned counsel contends -that there is a distinction
between an order granting permission under s. 65 and the
agreement contained in the sanad which is issued under, r.
87 (b). He urges that even if the sanad may not be
revisable under s. 211 of the Code, the order granting
permission under s. 65 is revisable under s. 21 1, and if
this order is revised the sanad falls along with the order.