Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.66 seconds)THE MADHYA PRADESH SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 1947
Section 7 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Special Police ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 September, 2022
16. Besides that, paragraphs 12 and 16 of the order passed by the
Division Bench in the case of Special Police Establishment,
Bhopal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2011 CRI.L.J. 2978 if are
read in juxtaposition then it reveals that SPE (Lokayukt) has the
locus standi to challenge the order refusing sanction for prosecution.
In para 12 of the said judgment, it appears that the Government
Advocate raised the question regarding authority/ jurisdiction of the
Court to go into the validity of the order refusing sanction because
according to the arguments advanced by government Advocate,
absolute power to accord or withhold sanction was conferred with
the State Government. Said contention was negatived by the earlier
Division Bench.
Madhya Pradesh Special Police ... vs State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors on 5 November, 2004
Recent two judgments of the Division Bench in Writ
14 W.P. No.17858/2020
Petition No.13776/2022 (State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sandeep
Kumar Lohani and Others) and Writ Petition No.25917/2021
(Special Police Establishment Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and
Others) apparently do not consider the case from this vantage point.
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Sandeep Kumar Lohani on 4 August, 2023
Recent two judgments of the Division Bench in Writ
14 W.P. No.17858/2020
Petition No.13776/2022 (State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sandeep
Kumar Lohani and Others) and Writ Petition No.25917/2021
(Special Police Establishment Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and
Others) apparently do not consider the case from this vantage point.