Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.35 seconds)

K.K. Ahuja vs V.K. Vora & Anr on 6 July, 2009

(2023) 1 SCC (Cri) 91], this Court, after referring to K.K. Ahuja [K.K. Ahuja v. V.K. Vora, (2009) 10 SCC 48 : (2009) 4 SCC (Civ) 1 : (2010) 2 SCC (Cri) 1181] referred to above, observed as under : (Sunita Palita case [Sunita Palita v. Panchami Stone Quarry, (2022) 10 SCC 152 : (2023) 1 SCC (Civ) 612 : (2023) 1 SCC (Cri) 91], SCC pp. 164-65, para 29) ::: Downloaded on - 11/07/2024 20:32:06 :::CIS P a g e | 25 "29. ... when the accused is the Managing Director or a Joint Managing Director of a company, it is not necessary to make an averment in the complaint that he is in charge of, and is responsible to the company .
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 454 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Sunita Palita vs M/S. Panchami Stone Quarry on 1 August, 2022

(2023) 1 SCC (Cri) 91], this Court, after referring to K.K. Ahuja [K.K. Ahuja v. V.K. Vora, (2009) 10 SCC 48 : (2009) 4 SCC (Civ) 1 : (2010) 2 SCC (Cri) 1181] referred to above, observed as under : (Sunita Palita case [Sunita Palita v. Panchami Stone Quarry, (2022) 10 SCC 152 : (2023) 1 SCC (Civ) 612 : (2023) 1 SCC (Cri) 91], SCC pp. 164-65, para 29) ::: Downloaded on - 11/07/2024 20:32:06 :::CIS P a g e | 25 "29. ... when the accused is the Managing Director or a Joint Managing Director of a company, it is not necessary to make an averment in the complaint that he is in charge of, and is responsible to the company .
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 87 - I Banerjee - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next