Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)Article 342 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bir Singh vs Delhi Jal Board . on 30 August, 2018
In the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, I am of
the firm view that the petitioner, namely, Dr. H. Sunita Devi, a Scheduled Caste
belonging to State of Manipur and being an ordinarily and permanent resident
of the State of Manipur cannot claim the benefit of reservation as Scheduled
Caste community in the State of Assam for the purpose of employment in the
present case for selection and appointment to the post of Assistant Professor,
Zoology, Cachar College, Silchar, which is reserved for the Scheduled Caste
candidate of State of Assam. Moreso, all the manipuris including the Scheduled
Caste and the Scheduled Tribe are recognized as an OBC in the State of Assam.
Action Committee On Issue Of Caste ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 18 July, 1994
In the case of Action Committee on Issue of Caste Certificate to Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes in the State of Maharashtra and Another (supra) after considering the
decision of this Court in the case of Marri Chandra Shekar Rao (supra) the question arose,
Whether a person belonging to caste or tribe specified for the purpose of Constitution to be
Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe in relation to State A migrates to State B, where a
caste or tribe with the same nomenclature is specified for the purposes of Constitution to be
a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe in relation to that State B, will that person be entitled
to claim the privileges and benefits admissible to persons belonging to Scheduled Caste
and/or Scheduled Tribe in State B? Holding that a person belonging to Scheduled
Caste/Scheduled Tribe in relation to his original State of which he is permanent or an
ordinarily resident cannot be deemed to be so in relation to any other State on his migration
to that State for the purpose of employment, education etc."
1