Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.26 seconds)Bhanji Devshibhai Luhar vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 3 October, 2012
18. Therefore considering all these aspects with regard to
what could be the reasonable period, the Hon'ble Divison Bench
in a judgment in case of Chandulal Gordhandas Ranodriya
and ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors. (supra) has made the
observations:
State Of Gujarat vs Patel Raghav Natha & Ors on 21 April, 1969
"From the aforesaid decisions, there is no doubt in our minds
that the power under sub-sec(1) of Sec.32-A of the Act can be
exercised within reasonable period and no outer limit can be
fixed for exercise of such power. The decision in Patel Raghav
Natha (supra), in our considered opinion, cannot be read as
laying down universal rule applicable to all statutes, at all times
Page 15 of 18
C/SCA/14843/2005 JUDGMENT
and under all circumstances without reference to the scheme
of the Act, underlying object to grant revisional power and
consequences which may ensue therefrom.............."
Shailesh Jadavji Varia vs Sub-Registrar And Ors. on 5 October, 1996
15. Again in a full bench judgment reported in 1996(3) GLR 783 -
Shailesh Jadavji Varia v. Sub-Registrar, Vadodara & Ors.
the aspect of exercise of power under the Bombay Stamp Act
was considered and it has been observed:
Veerayee Ammal vs Seeni Ammal on 19 October, 2001
16. Therefore the moot question is what could be said to be a
'reasonable period', which has again been considered by the
Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court in a judgment in case
of Chandulal Gordhandas Ranodriya and ors. v. State of
Gujarat & Ors. reported in 2013(2) 1788 - Chandulal
Gordhandas Ranodriya & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
quoting the earlier judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court
reported in 2002 (1) SCC 134-Veerayee Ammal v. Seeni
Ammal. Again according to the Advanced Law Lexicon by
P.Ramanatha Aiyer, 3rd Edn. 2005, 'reasonable time' has been
discussed and it has been clearly observed: