Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
T.V. Gnanavelu And Anr. vs D.P. Kannayya And Ors. on 21 December, 1967 cites

Champalal Jain And Ors. vs B.P. Venkataraman on 6 January, 1966

Apart from this fact, when this Court is called upon to interfere with the quantum of Rs. 4,000/- determined by the Tribunal, certain compelling factors, which should make the determination of the quantum shockingly excessive should be brought to the notice of the Court The principles that should apply in compelling an appellate court to interfere with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal have been elaborately set out in the judgment of Venkatadri, J., in Champalal v. Venkataraman, . Applying that test and bearing in mind the fact that the determination of such question has necessarily to be conjectural to some extent, it cannot be said that the fixation of Rs. 4,000/- as compensation under this head can be said to be excessive in the circumstances of this case.
Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1