Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
P. Savita S/O Shri P.L. Savita vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Defence ... on 1 May, 1985
12. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted
that the Principal Bench has not considered the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of P.
Savitha & Others (supra). In that case, the issue was
whether the Draughtsmen in the Ministry of Defence can
be denied the pay of Senior Draughtmen even after their
promotion. Therefore, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has
held that it would be a great injustice to continue
the appellants on the scales of pay of Draughtsmen even
after promotion as Senior Draughtsmen, which is
destructive of all incentive and initiative in the
service. We find that in the case before hand, there
is no such denial to the applicants.
Mr. Ibrahim Mollah And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 17 November, 1992
13. Similarly in the case of Ibrahim Mollah
(supra), the issue before the Hon'ble Calcutta High
Court was whether executives promoted from non-
17 OA No.60/2017
executive category to the executive category in between
01.01.1987 and 26.07.1989 (both dates inclusive) can
be given different pay. In the facts of that case, the
Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta has held that the method
of pay fixation provided for the executives promoted
from the non-executive category to the executive
category causing financial loss varying from Rs.100/-
to 620/- per month under the Office Memorandum dated
30.05.1991 compared to which is admissible to another
group of executives promoted on or before 31.12.1986
was not permissible.
1