Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.34 seconds)Section 10 in The M.P. Home Guards Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The M.P. Home Guards Act, 1947
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Home Gaurds Sainik Avam Pariwar Kalyan ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 June, 2022
32. We may thus note that the question as to whether the Home
Guard Sainiks are liable to be treated at par with the employees in the
police department and entitled to regualrisation of service and all
consequential benefits as regular/permanent employees has already
been conclusively decided against the Home Guard Sainiks in
Homeguard Sainik Evam Pariwar Kalyan Sangh (supra). The Court
has already held that "the declaration sought by the petitioners for
declaring them as civil post holders and, therefore, to regularize
treating them to be "civil post" holders can also be not granted". It
has also been held that "the system of calling of duty shall be done
away with and the employees shall be employed throughout the year
subject to their being physically fit or otherwise entitled to work in
accordance to law."
Article 23 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 18 in The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
The Coinage Act, 2011
Mallikarjuna Rao And Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 10 April, 1990
22. With regard to the claim for being declared as a Civil Post
Holder, the learned writ court relying upon the decision of the
Supreme Court of India in Mallikarjuna Rao & Others versus State of
Andhra Pradesh & Others (1990) 2 SCC 707, held that the court
could not issue a mandamus for implementing the recommendations
of the State Human Rights Commission and thus the relief could not
be granted.