Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)Pradeep Narayan Madgonkar Etc. Etc. vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 May, 1995
In Roop Chand v/s State of
Haryana reported in 1990 (1) CLR 69, it was observed that such
explanations that the public persons refused to join the proceedings are
unreliable and in Pradeep Narayan V/S State of Maharashtra reported in
AIR 1995 S.C. 1930 held that failure of police to join witness from locality
during search creates doubt about fairness of the investigation benefit of
which has to go to the accused.
Megha Singh vs State Of Haryana on 9 February, 1995
In such case, as observed by Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case titled as Megha Singh V/S State of Haryana reported in
1995 Crl.
Sunil Kumar Sambhudayal Gupta & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 November, 2010
L. J. 3988 and as held in the case titled as Sunil V/S State
reported in 1999 (1) JCC 85 (Delhi) benefit of doubt is to be given to the
accused.
Section 4 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Roop Chand And Others vs The State Of Haryana on 16 March, 2009
In Roop Chand v/s State of
Haryana reported in 1990 (1) CLR 69, it was observed that such
explanations that the public persons refused to join the proceedings are
unreliable and in Pradeep Narayan V/S State of Maharashtra reported in
AIR 1995 S.C. 1930 held that failure of police to join witness from locality
during search creates doubt about fairness of the investigation benefit of
which has to go to the accused.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1