Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.21 seconds)Smt.Darothi Clare Parreira & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 25 July, 1996
12. The policy decision of the State Government cannot be
examined on any other ground, except if it is contrary to the
constitutional provisions or against the statutory provisions.
(See Darothi Clare Parreira (Smt.) and others v. State of
Maharashtra and others2).
West Bengal Housing Board Etc vs Brijendra Prasad Gupta & Ors. Etc on 9 July, 1997
In W.B. Housing Board and others Vs. Brijendra Prasad
Gupta and others3, Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as under:
Federation Of Railway Officers ... vs Union Of India on 13 March, 2003
14. Unless a policy or action is unconstitutional or the order
is abuse of the power, the Court should not interfere in such
matters. (See Federation of Railway Officers Association and
others v. Union of India4).
All India Itdc Workers Union & Ors vs Itdc & Ors on 31 October, 2006
In All India ITDC Workers' Union and others Vs. ITDC and
others5, Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as under:-
All India Council For Technical Edu vs Surinder Kumar Dhawan & Ors on 18 February, 2009
17. Hon'ble Supreme Court in All India Council for Technical
Education Vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan and others6 has held that
"The role of statutory expert bodies on education and the role
of courts are well defined by a simple rule. If it is a
question of educational policy or an issue involving academic
matter, the courts keep their hands off. If any provision of
law or principle of law has to be interpreted, applied or
enforced, with reference to or connected with education, the
courts will step in." Further, "Judges must not rush in where
even educationists fear to tread. While there is no absolute
ban, it is a rule of prudence that courts should hesitate to
dislodge decisions of academic bodies." Para 32 of this
decision reads as under :