Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 43 (0.37 seconds)

C.I.T vs Dhadi Sahu on 18 November, 1992

Therefore, what the Supreme Court meant while saying "when the references were initiated" was only the valid references and not the initiation of references invalidly made. If the reference was valid, then the initiation was also valid. In the present case before us, the initiation of reference was invalid as there was no valid reference. Therefore, the decision of the Supreme Court in Dhadi Sahus case [1993] 199 ITR 610, has no application in this case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 99 - Y Dayal - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs P.I. Issac And Ors. on 26 August, 1987

The Supreme Court in Varkey Chacko v. CIT [1993] 203 ITR 885 affirmed the decision of the Kerala High Court in v. CIT v. Varkey Chacko [1982] 136 ITR 733, which was not followed by the Full Bench in P. I. Issacs case [1987] 168 ITR 793 (Ker). The Supreme Court held that "the crucial date, therefore, for purposes of penalty, was the date of such completion". The Supreme Court further held as follows (at page 890 of 203 ITR) :
Kerala High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next