Ramalinga Annavi vs Narayana Annavi on 7 March, 1922
1. There are three points in this appeal. The first is as regards the marriage expenses of one party who was married after the date of the suit, and also as to marriage expenses having been allowed in anticipation of another party's marriage. Having regard to the decision of the Privy Council in Ramalinga Annavi v. Narayana Annavi (1922) L.R. 49 I.A. 168, s. c. 24 Bom. L.R. 1209, it is clear that these expenses must be disallowed, viz., not only prospective marriage expenses, but also those incurred after the date of the suit and before the trial.