Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.76 seconds)Section 457 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 511 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Ram Veer Singh And Ors on 5 September, 2007
4.4 Similar
principle has been laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of
State
of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Ram Veer Singh & Ors, reported in 2007 AIR
SCW 5553
and in Girja
Prasad (Dead) by LRs Vs. state of MP, reported in 2007 AIR SCW 5589.
Thus, the powers which this Court may exercise against an order of
acquittal are well settled.
State Of Karnataka vs Hemareddy Alias Vemareddy And Anr on 27 January, 1981
4.5 It
is also a settled legal position that in acquittal appeal, the
appellate court is not required to re-write the judgement or to give
fresh reasonigns, when the reasons assigned by the Court below are
found to be just and proper. Such principle is laid down by the Apex
Court in the case of State
of Karnataka Vs. Hemareddy, reported in AIR 1981 SC 1417
wherein it is held as under:
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 378 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 4 July, 2006
In
the case of
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani Vs. State of Kerala & Anr, reported in
(2006)6 SCC, 39,
the Apex Court has narrated about the powers of the High Court in
appeal against the order of acquittal. In para 54 of the decision,
the Apex Court has observed as under:
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Chandrappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 2007
4.1 Further,
in the case of Chandrappa
Vs. State of Karnataka, reported in (2007)4 SCC 415
the Apex Court laid down the following principles: