Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.30 seconds)Section 9 in The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Bijoy Krishna Paul vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 1 April, 1968
In support of
his contention, he has placed reliance on a judgment passed by the Assam
and Nagaland High Court in the case of Bijoy Krishna Paul Vs. State of
Assam and others reported in 1968 SCC OnLine Gau 47 and the judgment
passed by the Allahabad High Court in the case of U.P. Cinema Exhibitors
Federation vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 1977 SCC OnLine All
562.
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: TRILOK SINGH
SAVNER
Signing time: 03/20/2025
5:40:41 PM
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:7084 -17-
WP No.9401/24, 11921/24 & 12606/24
Association Of Industries Dewas vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 May, 2018
28. As per the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, there has to be a
revision of wages after an interval of five years but in the State of Madhya
Pradesh after 2014 the State Government revised the rates after ten years by
increasing 25%, which means 12.5% per five years which cannot be said to
be on the higher side, for which the petitioners-Industrial Associations are
making so much hue and cry. In the last 10 years, the cost of consumable
goods, petrol, diesel, LPG, foodgrains, and essential commodities have
increased manifold. The Government has revised the salary of government
employees by implementing the 6th and 7th Pay Commission and regularly
increasing the wages by way of granting Dearness Allowance. Therefore, the
increase in the minimum rates of wages for workmen @ 25% after 10 years
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: TRILOK SINGH
SAVNER
Signing time: 03/20/2025
5:40:41 PM
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:7084 -18-
WP No.9401/24, 11921/24 & 12606/24
cannot be said to be on the higher side warranting interference by the High
Court under Art 226 of the Constitution of India. Apart from that, all the
grounds raised by the petitioners have already been answered in the case of
the Association of Industries, Dewas (supra).
Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd vs The State Of Ajmer on 14 October, 1954
Further reliance is placed on Bijay
Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of Ajmer reported in AIR 1955 SC 33, wherein
the Hon'ble Apex Court has upheld the necessity of minimum wage fixation
to prevent labour exploitation.
Chandra Bhavan Boarding And Lodging, ... vs The State Of Mysore And Anr on 29 September, 1969
Additionally, in the case of C. B. Boarding &
Lodging v. State of Mysore reported in AIR 1970 SC 2042 the Apex Court
clarified and held that minimum wages must ensure a reasonable standard of
living for workers.
U. Unichoyi And Others vs The State Of Kerala on 14 April, 1961
Further reliance is
placed by the counsels appearing for respondents on Ujjain Charitable Trust
Hospital & Research Centre vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2010
(3) MPLJ 29; Bijoy Krishna Paul vs. the State of Assam reported in 1968
SCC OnLine Gau 47; U.P. Cinema Exhibitors Federation vs. State of
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: TRILOK SINGH
SAVNER
Signing time: 03/20/2025
5:40:41 PM
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:7084 -11-
WP No.9401/24, 11921/24 & 12606/24
Uttar Pradesh reported in 1977 SCC OnLine All 562; Unichoyi v. State of
Kerala reported in AIR 1962 SC 12; Union Of India vs M.V. Mohanan
Nair reported in AIR 2020 SC 5107 and State of M.P. vs. R.D. Sharma
reported in 2022 (2) MPLJ 621.