Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.45 seconds)
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its ... vs Sunita Gajanan Shinde And Ors on 24 April, 2019
cites
New India Assurance Co.Ltd vs Bismillah Bai & Ors on 20 March, 2009
In the case of "New
India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Bismillah Bai and
Ors" [supra], "Lachoo Ram and Ors v. Himachal
Road Transport Corpn." [supra] and "Oriental
Insurance Co. Ltd., V. Premlata Shukla and ors."
[supra], the Apex Court has laid down the legal
principle that unless rash and negligent driving
::: Uploaded on - 24/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 25/04/2019 12:26:13 :::
10 fa3532.18
of the driver of the vehicle involved in the
accident is proved, the petition under Section 166
of the Motor Vehicles Act is not tenable. Only
because the vehicle is involved in the accident,
the owner and insurer of that vehicle cannot be
held liable to pay compensation, unless it is
shown that an accident was caused by rash and
negligent act of the driver of the vehicle
involved in the accident.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Premlata Shukla & Ors on 15 May, 2007
In the case of "New
India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Bismillah Bai and
Ors" [supra], "Lachoo Ram and Ors v. Himachal
Road Transport Corpn." [supra] and "Oriental
Insurance Co. Ltd., V. Premlata Shukla and ors."
[supra], the Apex Court has laid down the legal
principle that unless rash and negligent driving
::: Uploaded on - 24/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 25/04/2019 12:26:13 :::
10 fa3532.18
of the driver of the vehicle involved in the
accident is proved, the petition under Section 166
of the Motor Vehicles Act is not tenable. Only
because the vehicle is involved in the accident,
the owner and insurer of that vehicle cannot be
held liable to pay compensation, unless it is
shown that an accident was caused by rash and
negligent act of the driver of the vehicle
involved in the accident.
Lachoo Ram & Ors vs Himachal Road Transport Corpn on 28 January, 2014
In the case of "New
India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Bismillah Bai and
Ors" [supra], "Lachoo Ram and Ors v. Himachal
Road Transport Corpn." [supra] and "Oriental
Insurance Co. Ltd., V. Premlata Shukla and ors."
[supra], the Apex Court has laid down the legal
principle that unless rash and negligent driving
::: Uploaded on - 24/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 25/04/2019 12:26:13 :::
10 fa3532.18
of the driver of the vehicle involved in the
accident is proved, the petition under Section 166
of the Motor Vehicles Act is not tenable. Only
because the vehicle is involved in the accident,
the owner and insurer of that vehicle cannot be
held liable to pay compensation, unless it is
shown that an accident was caused by rash and
negligent act of the driver of the vehicle
involved in the accident.
Section 149 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
1