Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Mohd Hasnain & Ors. vs Jagram Meena & Ors. on 24 March, 2014
13. This Court in the said case of Mohd. Hasnain & Ors. vs. Jagram Meena
& Ors. (supra) relied on the judgments of the Supreme Court in case of M.
Mansoor vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., MANU/SC/1042 which
judgment further relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case
Amrit Bhanu Shali & Ors. vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
MANU/SC/0537/2012 held as follows:-
M.Mansoor & Anr vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd on 3 October, 2013
14. M. Mansoor vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd (supra) was a case
where the deceased was a bachelor of 24 years of age and the Supreme Court
held that the selection of the multiplier is based on the age of the deceased and
not the age of the dependants.
Amrit Bhanu Shali & Ors vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 4 April, 2012
Further, in the case of Amrit Bhanu Shali &
Ors. vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. (supra) the deceased was a
bachelor aged 26 years and the Court applied the multiplier of 17. In view of
the said judgment passed by this Court, following the judgments of the
Supreme Court, the Tribunal erred in not taking the age of the deceased to
consider the appropriate multiplier.
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Vimal Kanwar & Ors vs Kishore Dan & Ors on 3 May, 2013
8. On the contention of the respondentNo.3/insurance company regarding a
sum of Rs. 15 lacs towards group insurance policy received by the claimants,
no details of the policy have been pointed out to this Court. Reference may be
MAC.APP.500/2012 Page 2 of 5
had to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Vimal Kanwar and
Others vs. Kishore Dan and Others, (2013) 7 SCC 476 which relies on the
judgment of Helen C. Rebello (Mrs) & Ors. vs. Maharashtra state Road
Transport Corporation & Anr. (1999) 1 SCC 90 which judgment in para 35
held as follows:
Mrs. Helen C. Rebello & Ors vs Maharashtra State Road Transport ... on 18 September, 1998
8. On the contention of the respondentNo.3/insurance company regarding a
sum of Rs. 15 lacs towards group insurance policy received by the claimants,
no details of the policy have been pointed out to this Court. Reference may be
MAC.APP.500/2012 Page 2 of 5
had to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Vimal Kanwar and
Others vs. Kishore Dan and Others, (2013) 7 SCC 476 which relies on the
judgment of Helen C. Rebello (Mrs) & Ors. vs. Maharashtra state Road
Transport Corporation & Anr. (1999) 1 SCC 90 which judgment in para 35
held as follows:
V. Mekala vs M. Malathi & Anr on 25 April, 2014
In view of the judgments of the Supreme Court in the case of Rajesh &
Ors. vs. Rajbir Singh & Ors. (2013) 9 SCC 54 and V.Mekala vs. M.Malathi &
MAC.APP.500/2012 Page 3 of 5
Anr., 2014 ACJ 1441 as the age of the deceased was 21 years, 50% is added to
the income towards future increase on account of inflation.
Smt. Rajesh And Others vs Rajbir Singh And Others on 29 January, 2010
17. On the issue of non-pecuniary heads, In view of the judgment of
the Supreme Court in the case of Rajesh & Ors. vs. Rajbir Singh &
Ors.(supra), I enhance the amount of for loss of love and affection to Rs.
1,00,000/- and the amount under the head of funeral expenses is increased to
Rs.25,000/-.
1