Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)Section 72 in Consumer Protection Act, 2019 [Entire Act]
Section 73 in Consumer Protection Act, 2019 [Entire Act]
Section 168 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 169 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 242 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Karnataka Housing Board vs K.A. Nagamani on 6 May, 2019
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on judgment
passed in the case of Karnataka Housing Board versus K.A.Nagamani, Civil
Appeal No. 4631 of 2019 decided on 06.05.2019 to submit that revision
petition would not lie against the order passed in execution proceedings by
the Commission to the National Commission and therefore the writ petition
would be maintainable against order passed in execution proceedings.
Learned counsel further submits that the Commission has erred in rejecting
the application for deleting the name of the petitioner from array of
judgment debtors and it has also erred to hold that the petitioner was looking
after the affairs of the Company and was responsible for running the project
in question. Learned counsel further submits that as the petitioner had
already submitted his resignation from the post of Director, before the
execution proceedings were initiated by the respondent, he could not have
been impleaded nor could he said to be responsible for the non-execution of
the orders passed by the Commission as he was no more connected with the
M/s Raheja Developers Limited already impleaded as judgment debtor No.