Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.28 seconds)Section 224 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Article 241 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 107 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
Moti Lal And Ors. vs The Government Of The State Of Uttar ... on 11 May, 1950
See the cases referred to in -Moti Lal v. The State
through Shrimati Sagrawati(1). Our attention has not been
drawn to any case which has taken a different view and, as
at present advised, we see no reason to take a different
view.
Government of India Act, 1935
Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd. vs Sukumar Mukherjee on 30 August, 1950
This power of superintendence conferred by article 227 is,
as pointed out by Harries C. J., in Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd.
v. Sukumar Mukherjee(2), to be exercised most sparingly and
only in appropriate cases in order to keep the Subordinate
Courts within the bounds of their authority and not for
correcting mere errors. As rightly pointed out by the
Judicial Commissioner in the case before us the lower courts
in refusing to make an order for ejectment acted
arbitrarily. The lower courts realised the legal position
but in effect declined to do what was by section 13 (2) (i)
incumbent on them to do and thereby refused to exercise
jurisdiction vested in them by law. It. was, therefore, a
case which called for an interference by the court of the
Judicial Commissioner and it acted
(1) I.L.R. [1952] 1 All. 558 at p. 567,
(2) A.I.R. 1951 Cal. 193.