Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.29 seconds)
Jaydeep D. Tatmia vs The Comptroller & Auditor General Of ... on 11 March, 2014 cites

P.K. Shastri vs State Of M.P. & Ors on 19 August, 1999

Similarly in P.K. Shastri (supra), Justice Santosh Hegde has also held that the authority directing entry of adverse remark must first come to the conclusion that in the fact situation it is imperative to do so to set right the wrong committed by the officer concerned.In State of M.P. Vs. Vishnu Dutta (supra), the Honble Supreme Court has held that the complete service record of the officer needs to be seen while considering his case for promotion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

Amrik Singh And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 11 April, 1980

13. We feel that this matter is completely covered by the judgments of the Honble Supreme Court in the above three cases. As a result, the ratio laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in Amrik Singh (supra) would not apply in the present case as in that matter the Court, after having gone through the concerned file and records, came to the conclusion that Prima facie, we cannot say, having gone through those records, that these notings are baseless. In this case, the facts are different, as pointed out above, this is surely a case of malafide.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 95 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Rajinder Singh Sehrawat vs Union Of Indian And Others on 24 May, 2001

Court could not interfere with assessment made by superiors of Petitioner, unless it was shown to be arbitrary or suffering from vice of breach of some Rule or Regulation, which applied to Petitioner  No material had been placed, which would indicate that remarks recorded by Reporting Officer and grades given to Petitioner, in ACRs for relevant years were arbitrary  Reporting Officer had justified grading given by him by giving details of types in which delay, carelessness and non-application of mind on part of the Petitioner was noticed by him  No breach of any Rule or Regulation was even alleged. The respondents also cited the judgment of the Honble High Court of Delhi in Rajinder Singh Sehrawat Vs. Union of India and others, 93 2001 DLT 417 in which, while discussing the issue as involved in the present case, the Court held as follows:
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 12 - M S Siddiqui - Full Document

State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors vs Vishnu Prasad Sharma And Ors on 9 February, 1966

Similarly in P.K. Shastri (supra), Justice Santosh Hegde has also held that the authority directing entry of adverse remark must first come to the conclusion that in the fact situation it is imperative to do so to set right the wrong committed by the officer concerned.In State of M.P. Vs. Vishnu Dutta (supra), the Honble Supreme Court has held that the complete service record of the officer needs to be seen while considering his case for promotion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 240 - A K Sarkar - Full Document
1