Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 61 (0.30 seconds)

Sabia Khan And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 30 July, 1998

In M/s. Tilokchand Motichand & Ors. Vs. H.B. Munshi & Anr., AIR 1970 SC 898; State of Haryana Vs. Karnal Distillery, AIR 1977 SC 781; and Sabia Khan & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors., (1999) 1 SCC 271, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that filing totally misconceived petition amounts to abuse of the process of the Court and such a litigant is not required to be dealt with lightly, as petition containing misleading and inaccurate statement, if filed, to achieve an ulterior purpose amounts to abuse of the process of the Court."
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 72 - Full Document

Bisheshwar Pratap Sahi vs Parath Nath on 20 July, 1934

While deciding the said case, the Court placed reliance upon the judgments of the Privy Council in Rajah Kotagiri Venkata 5 Subbamma (supra); Chhajju Ram (supra); Bisheshwar Pratap Sahi & Anr. Vs. Parath Nath & Anr, AIR 1934 PC 213; and on judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s. A.C. Estates Vs. M/s. Serajuddin and Co. & Anr., AIR 1966 SC 935; and Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos & Anr. Vs. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius & Ors., AIR 1954 SC 526.
Bombay High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 70 - Full Document

Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos And ... vs The Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius And ... on 21 May, 1954

While deciding the said case, the Court placed reliance upon the judgments of the Privy Council in Rajah Kotagiri Venkata 5 Subbamma (supra); Chhajju Ram (supra); Bisheshwar Pratap Sahi & Anr. Vs. Parath Nath & Anr, AIR 1934 PC 213; and on judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s. A.C. Estates Vs. M/s. Serajuddin and Co. & Anr., AIR 1966 SC 935; and Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos & Anr. Vs. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius & Ors., AIR 1954 SC 526.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 831 - B Jagannadhadas - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next