Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.32 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Karnataka & Anr vs All India Manufacturers Organization & ... on 20 April, 2006
56. Mr Dwivedi has drawn our attention to a
decision of this Court in State of Karnataka v.
All India Manufacturers Company [(2006) 4
SCC 683] wherein it was held: (SCC pp. 708-09,
para 66)
'66. Taking an overall view of the matter, it
appears that there could hardly be a dispute
that the Project is a mega project which is in
the larger public interest of the State of
Karnataka and merely because there was a
change in the Government, there was no
necessity for reviewing all decisions taken by
the previous Government, which is what
appears to have happened.
State Of U.P. And Anr vs Johri Mal on 21 April, 2004
That such an action
cannot be taken every time there is a change of
Government has been clearly laid down in State
of U.P. v. Johri Mal [(2004) 4 SCC 714] and in
1
(2008) 2 SCC 161
48
JAK, J
W.P.No.9914 of 2017
State of Haryana v. State of Punjab [(2002) 2
SCC 507] where this Court observed thus:
State Of Assam And 2 Ors vs Arabinda Rabha 13 Ors on 15 March, 2021
70. It is settled proposition of law that even the selectees
do not have any legal right of appointment. It is pertinent
to extract the relevant portion of the Hon'ble Apex Court
judgment in State of Assam & Ors. vs. Arabinda Rabha &
Ors (Civil Appeal No.2350 of 2025) the Apex Court held as
follows:
1