Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)
Ramesh Kumar vs Vivek Kumar on 6 December, 2021 cites

M.P. State Legal Service Authority vs Prateek Jain And Anr on 10 September, 2014

compounding fee @ 15% and, therefore, a prayer has been made by learned counsel for exempting or reducing the compounding fee, keeping in view ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court in Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. 2010 (5) SCC 663, as clarified in Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority Vs. Prateek Jain and another 2014 (10) SCC 690.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 359 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Ramesh Kolta And Ors vs The State Of M.P. 68 Mac/99/2012 Smt ... on 7 February, 2018

Present Revision Petition has been filed assailing judgment dated 24.10.2019, passed by learned Additional ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:23:40 :::CIS 2 Sessions Judge, Hamirpur (H.P.), Circuit Court Barsar, in Criminal Appeal No.05 of 2017, titled as Ramesh Kumar vs. Vivek Kumar, whereby judgment and order dated 23.03.2017/28.03.2017, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Barsar District .
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 4 - P Diwaker - Full Document
1