Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011
Learned counsel for the appellant has argued that under the
conventional heads an amount of Rs.1,75,000/- has been awarded which is
against the maximum limits of Rs. 70,000/- which has been prescribed in
the Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi and others, 2017(4)
RCR (Civil)1009.
Minu Rout & Anr vs Satya Pradyumna Mohapatra & Ors on 2 September, 2013
Learned counsel for the claimant countered by arguing that
there is no inflexible rule, especially in a compensation under beneficial
legislation, that the income stated by these illiterate people is the last word
when the minimum wages show something different. He has relied upon
the judgment of the Supreme Court passed in the matter of Minu Rout and
another v. Satya Pradyumna Mohapatra and others reported as 2013 (10)
3 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 13-08-2018 04:33:36 :::
FAO-9995-2014 (O&M) 4
SCC 695. In that case the widow had claimed the income as Rs.5,000/- per
month but the Supreme Court held that since the deceased was a driver his
income be taken as Rs. 6,000/- per month.
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948
1