Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)

Valliyammal & Anr vs Spl.Tahsildar(Laq) & Anr on 1 August, 2011

8. Considering the fact that in Valliyammal's case cited supra for the lands covered under notification dated 15.03.1995, the Hon'ble Supreme court had fixed the market value at Rs.30/- per square feet, the appellants, whose lands are similarly placed as that of the lands covered under the notification dated 15.03.1995, are also entitled at Rs.30/- per square feet with all other statutory benefits as per the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 4 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Palaniammal, Rukmaniammal And ... vs The District Collector And The Special ... on 1 March, 2008

3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants would contend that vast extent of land comprised in various survey fields situated at Kasipalayam village was acquired by the 1s respondents on behalf of the 2nd respondent for Erode Neighbourhood Scheme and an award was also passed for the for the acquired lands. Not being satisfied with the compensation amount, some of the lands owners had sought for reference under Section 18 of the Act and the reference court had enhanced the award amount. When the lands owners had taken the mater on appeal, a Division Bench of this court modified the award of the reference court and fixed compensation ranging from Rs.16 per square feet to Rs.20/- per square feet depending upon the date of Notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Act. Further aggrieved over the same, the lands owners approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court by judgement in Valliammal v. Tahsildar reported in (2011) 8 SCC 91 enhanced the award amount and in respect of Section 4(1) notification, dated 15.03.1995, the http://www.judis.nic.in 4 Hon'ble Supreme court has fixed compensation at Rs.30/- per square feet besides all other statutory benefits with a deduction of one third amount towards development cost on the value of the land. Therefore, according to the learned counsel, the appellants, whose lands were similarly placed, are also entitled to Rs.30/- per square with other statutory benefits.
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - P Jyothimani - Full Document
1