Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.24 seconds)Section 8 in Children Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Children Act, 1960
Section 2 in Children Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Article 162 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of U.P. vs Preetam Singh on 3 December, 2015
“41. Accordingly, both writ petitions are
allowed and the impugned orders dated
05.05.2015 and 13.05.2015 contained in
Annexure No.1 and 2 to the Writ Petition
No.12645(S/B) of 2017 are quashed to the
extent they are contrary to the judgment
passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the
case of State of U.P. vs. Preetam Singh and
others, Civil Appeal No.6307 of 2010. A
mandamus is issued to the respondents to
grant benefit of arrears of salary payable
to the employees of Parishad w.e.f.
1.1.2006 to 13.01.2010, and to fix their
pension/family pension and also release
gratuity in accordance with the provisions
of U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
th
Regulations dated 19 May, 2009, and in the
light of the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in Civil Appeal No.6307 of 2010 from
the date of their entitlement alongwith
interest @ 9% per annum within a period of
two months from the date of production of
certified copy of this order, failing which
the petitioners shall be entitled and paid
interest at the rate of 12% per annum.”
Virendra Kumar Kannaujiya Son Of ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ... on 6 May, 2005
In Writ Petition (S/B)No. 10355 of 2017 (Virendra
Kumar and others vs. State of U.P. and others)
following prayers have been made:
U.P. Industrial Housing Act, 1955
Chandra Pal Singh And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 19 April, 1985
11. On 14.01.2010, the State Government has issued an
order approving the pay band and grade pay and other
9
allowances in the revised pay structure to the
employees of Board, according to the decision taken
on the recommendations of 7th U.P. Pay Committee 2008
to the employees of Public Sector/Corporations. In
consequences to the Government order dated
14.01.2010, the Housing Commissioner issued the
consequential order dated 23.01.2010. In the
subsequent Government order dated 15.09.2011 it was
clarified that arrears of revised pay for the period
from 01.01.2006 to 13.01.2010 shall not be admissible
to the Board employees. The State Government issued
another letter dated 05.05.2015 regarding pensionary
benefits to the employees of the Board in compliance
of the order dated 23.09.2014 passed by this Court in
Preetam Singh’s case. The Board issued a
consequential order dated 05.05.2015. The Writ
Petition No.12645(S/S) of 2016 (Chandra Pal Singh and
others vs. State of U.P. and others) filed by the
retired Junior Engineers and retired Class I and II
Officers of the Board.
Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur And Ors. vs The State Of Punjab on 12 April, 1955
38. A Constitution Bench of this Court in Rai Sahib
Ram Jawaya Kapur and others vs. The State of Punjab,
AIR 1955 SC 549, had occasion to examine Article 162
39
of the Constitution. Following was laid down in
paragraph 7: