Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.48 seconds)

Md.Ali @ Guddu vs State Of U.P on 10 March, 2015

39 In Md. Ali Vs. State of UP, 2015 (3) SCALE 274, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that "Be it noted, there can be no iota of doubt that on the basis of the sole testimony of the prosecutrix, if it is unimpeachable and beyond reproach, a conviction can be based and in Mohd. Iqbal v. State of Jharkhand reported in (2013) 14 SCC 481, the Hon'ble ::: Downloaded on - 06/09/2023 21:30:30 :::CIS 24 Supreme Court has held that "There is no prohibition in law to convict the accused of rape on the basis of sole testimony of the .
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 214 - D Misra - Full Document

Md.Eqbal & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand on 22 July, 2013

39 In Md. Ali Vs. State of UP, 2015 (3) SCALE 274, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that "Be it noted, there can be no iota of doubt that on the basis of the sole testimony of the prosecutrix, if it is unimpeachable and beyond reproach, a conviction can be based and in Mohd. Iqbal v. State of Jharkhand reported in (2013) 14 SCC 481, the Hon'ble ::: Downloaded on - 06/09/2023 21:30:30 :::CIS 24 Supreme Court has held that "There is no prohibition in law to convict the accused of rape on the basis of sole testimony of the .
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 44 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Ramnaresh & Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 February, 2012

of 70 In Ramnaresh & Ors vs. State Of Chhattisgarh, 2012 (4) SCC 257, while dealing with case of death penalty, rt the Hon'ble Supreme Court while relying upon judgment in Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 684 and Machhi Singh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan [(1983) 3 SCC 470 has laid down following principles to be borne in mind while sentencing the accused:
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 148 - S Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next