Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
V.M. Kurian vs State Of Kerala And Others on 27 March, 2001
He also relied on the judgments reported as M. Kurien v. State 2nd 1999 (2) Del 514; Ravi Kumar v. State (124) DLT 2005 1 and K. Ramakrishna and Ors v. State of Bihar .
Ravi Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 4 March, 2005
He also relied on the judgments reported as M. Kurien v. State 2nd 1999 (2) Del 514; Ravi Kumar v. State (124) DLT 2005 1 and K. Ramakrishna and Ors v. State of Bihar .
Central Bureau Of Investigation, ... vs Duncans Agro Industries Ltd.,Calcutta on 9 July, 1996
12. Learned Counsel for the petitioner relied upon the decision reported as C.B.I. v. Duncans Agro and the decision in Rachna Kapoor v. State 2005 (35) AIC 424 (Del) for the submission that in such cases, interests of justice indicate that the criminal proceedings should be quashed.
Raghubir Saran Jain And Anr. vs State And Anr. on 28 June, 1995
17. The Court therefore, has to be circumspect and has to see that its decision in exercise of this power is based on sound principles. Inherent powers should not be exercised to stifle a legitimate prosecution. The High Court ordinarily is expected to refrain from giving a prima facie decision in cases. Althouth there can be no thumb rule as regards cases in which the High Court will exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction of quashing the proceedings, the power can be used at any stage. Re The Janata Dal etc. v. H.S. Chowdhary and Ors. etc. , Dr. Raghubir Saran v. State of Bihar and Anr. . Nevertheless, the Court cannot meticulously analyze the case of the complainant in the light of all probabilities in order to determine whether a conviction would be sustainable and on such premise, arrive at a conclusion that the proceedings are to be quashed.
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
In State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 the Supreme Court, while commenting on the plenitude of that the power, cautioned that it should be exercised sparingly and in the rarest cases. The illustrative categories indicated by the Court, in that decision are:
Smt. Rachna Kapoor vs State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) And Ors. [Along ... on 8 July, 2005
12. Learned Counsel for the petitioner relied upon the decision reported as C.B.I. v. Duncans Agro and the decision in Rachna Kapoor v. State 2005 (35) AIC 424 (Del) for the submission that in such cases, interests of justice indicate that the criminal proceedings should be quashed.
1