Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)
Indu Gupta vs Director, Sports Punjab And Anr. on 31 May, 1999 cites

Raj Singh vs The Maharshi Dayanand University And ... on 31 January, 1994

In Raj Singh v. Maharshi Dayanand University, 1994 (4) R.S.J. 289 another Full Bench of this Court took the view that a candidate will have to be taken to be bound by the information supplied in the admission form and cannot be allowed to take a stand that suits him at a given time. The Full Bench approved the view expressed in earlier Full Bench that eligibility for admission to a course has to be seen according to the prospectus issued before the Entrance Examination and that the admission has to be made on the basis of instructions given in the prospectus, having the force of law.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 52 - Full Document

Rahul Prabhakar vs Punjab Technical University And Ors. on 16 May, 1997

10. Subsequently, another Full Bench of this Court in the case of Rahul Prabhakar v. Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar, 1997 (3) RSJ 475: (AIR 1998 Punj & Har 18) recapitulated the entire law on the subject. The Full Bench was considering the same brochure for the previous year of the Punjab Technical University. The Court held as under :--
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 89 - T H Chalapathi - Full Document

Sachin Gaur vs Punjab University, Patiala And Others on 12 October, 1995

Again Full Bench of this Court in Sachin Gaur v. Punjab University, 1996 (1) RSJ 1 : (AIR 1996 Punj & Har 109) took the view that there has to be a cut off date provided for admission and the same cannot be changed afterwards. These views expressed by earlier Full Benches have been followed in CWP No. 6756 of 1996 by the three of us constituting another Full Bench. Thus, it is settled law that the provisions contained in the information brochure for the Common Entrance Test 1997 have the force of law and have to be strictly complied with. No modification can be made by the court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Whenever a notification calling for applications, fixes date and time within which applications are to be received whether sent through post or by any other mode that time schedule has to be complied with in letter and spirit. If the application has not reached the co-ordinator or the competent authority as the case may be the same cannot be considered as having been filed in terms of the provisions contained in the prospectus or Information Brochure. Applications filed in violation of the terms of the brochure have only to be rejected."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 51 - S P Kurdukar - Full Document

Daljit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 12 November, 1998

In Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 9211 of 1997 (Daljit Singh) v. (State of Punjab, decided on August 26, 1997 and 12093 of 1997 (Ms. Mukta Bansal v. (State of Punjab), decided on August 28, 1997, other D. Bs. took the view that application for admission should have the copy of the gradation certificate issued by the Director of Sports, and failure to send the gradation certificate along with the application is fatal and that candidate who produces the gradation certificate after the submission of the application is not entitled to the benefit of reservation, as a sports person. In view of this divergent view, we refer this case to a Full Bench, for consideration."
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1