Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.29 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 5 in The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 16 in The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 107 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Suraj Mall Mohta And Co vs A. V. Visvanatha Sastri And Another on 28 May, 1954
In course of his argument, the learned Advocate General referred to the cases of Suraj Mall Mohta & Co. v. A.V. Vishvanath Sastri and Anr. , Purshotlam Govindji Halm v. Shri B.M. Dassi and Ors. , Collector of Malabar and Anr. v. Erimmal Ebrahim Hajee , Manna Lal and Anr. v. Collector of Jhalawar and Ors. , Nav Rattanmal and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Lachhman Dass v. State of Punjab . All the aforesaid cases have been noticed in the minority judgment of the Supreme Court. It was held in the cases other than the ease reported in5 that the Revenue Recovery Acts and other Acts creating special tribunals and procedure for the expeditious recovery of revenue and State sues are in the public interest and they do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.