Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)
Harjinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 5 September, 2000 cites

Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Assn vs State Of Punjab on 7 December, 1993

No telegram was given by the wife till 8-7-2000 at 10.30 a.m. In the petition it is stated that the husband was "bundled" into a gypsy. Yet she seems to have remained calm for 24 hours. I find much substance in the submissions of Mr. Battas, learned counsel for respondent No. 6, that the petition has been filed only to create a defence to the case registered against the alleged detenu Under Sections 15/61 and 85 of the NDPS Act. The observations made by the Supreme Court in the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association's case (1996 (3) Rec Cri R 773) (supra) would not be applicable to the facts of this case. There an advocate, his wife and his son had been kidnapped by the police. They were alleged to have been eliminated by the police. One Harpreet alias Lucky had been falsely implicated by the police, as being the kidnapper. The High Court refused to order a CBI enquiry. In these circumstances, Supreme Court made the following observations :
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 43 - S C Agrawal - Full Document
1