Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.35 seconds)The Delhi Land Reforms Rules, 1954
Section 4 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Ranvir Singh & Anr vs Union Of India on 7 September, 2005
In the case of Ranvir Singh versus Union of India, it was
held that market value of a fully developed land cannot be compared with a
wholly underdeveloped land although they may be adjoining or situated at a
little distance. For determining the market value, it is trite that the nature of the
land plays an important role.
Bhim Singh vs State Of Haryana on 11 December, 2002
In
the case of Ranvir Singh, reference was made to the case of Bhim Singh versus
State of Haryana SCC (2003) 10 page 529 in following terms:
"10... It was next submitted that the claimants were entitled
to higher compensation as the respondents had in 1989
auctioned plots of land at the rate of Rs. 1,725/ to Rs.
2,510/ per sq. yard. In our view, this submission merely
needs to be stated to be rejected. What price is fetched after
LAC No. 252/09 Page No.12/16
full development cannot be the basis for fixing
compensation in respect of land which was agricultural."
Lal Chand vs Union Of India & Anr on 12 August, 2009
38. Moreover, in the case of Lal Chand (supra) the schedule of
market rates of land in different parts of Delhi were specifically dealt with and
it was held:
"Para 17... In this case, there is nothing to show the circle
rates have been determined by any statutorily appointed
committee by adopting scientific basis. Hence, the principle
LAC No. 252/09 Page No.13/16
in Jawajee Naganatham will apply and they will not be of any
assistance for determining the market value. Further, they do
not purport to be market value for lands in rural areas on the
outskirts of Delhi nor the market values relating to Rithala
village. The circle rates relate to urban / city areas in Delhi and
are wholly irrelevant."
Shyam Sunder Agarwal & Co vs Union Of India on 9 January, 1996
v. Petitioners are entitled to benefit of Sunder vs. Union of
India: 93 (2001) DLT 153.
Haryana State Lotteries, Iqbal Chand ... vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 17 July, 1998
In the light of judgment of Hon'ble High Court in the case of
Indu Khurana Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, in CWP No. 4143/03 dated
26.03.2010 Delhi Land Reforms Act ceases to apply to an agricultural land after
the area is urbanized.