Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.41 seconds)

Sh. B.L. Kantroo vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. on 25 September, 2008

In B.L. Kantroo v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. the DB was considering the plea of a consumer who sought a declaration of invalidation of an electricity bill and in that context held that the exclusive jurisdiction to determine such question, in terms of Section 145 of the Act, vested in the Special Court. The DB was not dealing with a situation where there has been a compounding of the offence under Section 152 of the Act and whether in such eventuality, the Special Court could still determine the civil liability under Sections 154 (5) of the Act.
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 110 - M Singh - Full Document

Rahdey Shyam Bansal vs B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. And Ors. on 18 February, 2008

21. This Court had in Radhey Shyam Bansal v. B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. (supra) occasion to examine Section 152 of the Act. The context there was a consumer approaching the Special Court with an application under Section 152 for compounding the offence and the BRPL insisting before the Special Court that without payment of the theft bill amount, it could not agree to the compounding. That plea of BRPL was accepted by the Special Court. The consumer then approached this Court, assailing the order of the Special Court, rejecting his application for compounding of the offence under Section 152 of the Act. After analysing Section 152 of the Act and drawing a distinction between the said provision and Section 200 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, this Court observed as under:
1   2 Next